Legal Opinion

Kerpen v. First Investors Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLouis J. Capozzoli, J.

Defendant moves for accelerated judgment pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 7) and 3001 declaring that the contract provision challenged by the plaintiffs is valid and binding and that the defendant is not liable to the plaintiffs for commissions and for further relief dismissing the cause to the extent it purports to be a class or representative action and requiring that a separate cause be stated on behalf of each plaintiff.

Seller representatives engaged by defendant solicit and procure customers to purchase mutual fund contractual plans. The salesmen earn commissions and “continuing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pratt v. . ShortNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Sutherland v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Liddicoat v. Kenosha City Board of EducationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Kidd v. OakesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amory H. Bradford v. The New York Times CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Smith v. MeyerNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API