Legal Opinion
Sutherland v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1914PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Action upon a contract.
1Opinion of the CourtWoodward, J.
The complaint'alleges that the plaintiff is a resident of the city of Buffalo and duly authorized to transact the business of an insurance broker, and that the defendant Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company is a foreign corporation, with its principal place of business in the city of Hartford, Conn.; that heretofore and on or about the 3d day of June, 1907, the above-named plaintiff and one David B. Cooper, as general agent of said defendant Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company, entered into a certain contract in writing wherein and whereby the plaintiff herein became the agent of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chase v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Heyn v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Hercules Mutual Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BrinkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Heyn v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Wightman v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
3Cited by13 opinions
- Masden v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Locher v. New York Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
- Barr v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of CanadaSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Buskuhl v. Family Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- McPherrin v. Sun Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.