Kidd v. Oakes
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
The question raised by this appeal is whether plaintiffs may recover the benefit paid to defendant pursuant to a profit-sharing plan. While the contention is that the contract results in unlawful restraint, yet an employee may legally undertake a restriction of his liberty to earn his living if he, by the contract, may be relieved of the restriction by forfeiting a contract right or by adhering to the provisions of the contract (Kristt v. Whelan, 4 A D 2d 195, affd. 5 N Y 2d 807; Liddcoat v. Kenosha City Bd. of Educ., 17 Wis. 2d 400; Pratt v. Short, 79 N. Y. 437). The agreement may not be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Pratt v. . ShortNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Liddicoat v. Kenosha City Board of EducationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Warner v. de CuevasNew York Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amory H. Bradford v. The New York Times CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- International Business MacHines Corp. v. MartsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Kerpen v. First Investors Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- Friedman v. RomaineNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Smith v. MeyerNew York Supreme Court · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.