Legal Opinion

Kidd v. Oakes

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 27, 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The question raised by this appeal is whether plaintiffs may recover the benefit paid to defendant pursuant to a profit-sharing plan. While the contention is that the contract results in unlawful restraint, yet an employee may legally undertake a restriction of his liberty to earn his living if he, by the contract, may be relieved of the restriction by forfeiting a contract right or by adhering to the provisions of the contract (Kristt v. Whelan, 4 A D 2d 195, affd. 5 N Y 2d 807; Liddcoat v. Kenosha City Bd. of Educ., 17 Wis. 2d 400; Pratt v. Short, 79 N. Y. 437). The agreement may not be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Pratt v. . ShortNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Liddicoat v. Kenosha City Board of EducationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Warner v. de CuevasNew York Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Amory H. Bradford v. The New York Times CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. International Business MacHines Corp. v. MartsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  3. Kerpen v. First Investors Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Friedman v. RomaineNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Smith v. MeyerNew York Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API