Legal Opinion

Smith v. Meyer

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin Evans, J.

The plaintiff Andrew B. Smith brings this purported class action against the individual defendants, as trustees and members of the administrative committee of the profit sharing plan for the employees of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“ Plan ”). Under the terms of the Plan, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith (“ Merrill Lynch”), and its respective predecessors in interest, as sole contributor, made regular contributions to the Plan on behalf of its employees, including the plaintiff and those he claims to represent. The plaintiff was employed by Merrill Lynch as an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Frame v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Ware v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Simons v. FriedNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Kidd v. OakesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. William H. Nolan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Richard B. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Post v. LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API