Legal Opinion

Pratt v. . Short

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 1880PublishedCited by 79 opinions

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the fourth judicial department, in favor of defendants, entered upon an order reversing a ‘judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon the report of a referee, and directing final judgment for defendants. The nature of the action and the facts are set forth sufficiently in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The People's Safe Deposit and Savings Institution, a corporation created by chapter 816 of the Laws of 1868, in August, 1872, upon the application of defendants, composing the firm of H. W. Short & Co., discounted á note made by one Alice Yam Clock, for $1,900, payable to the order of H. W. Short & Co. seventy days after its date, and indorsed by the payees, who received the proceeds of the discount. The note was taken by H. W. Short & Co. upon a debt owing by the maker to the payees. It was not paid at maturity, and was duly protested. The Safe Deposit Company in September, 1872, became…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New York Firemen Insurance v. ElyNew York Supreme Court · 1824
  2. Utica Insurance v. CadwellNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  3. N.Y. State Loan and Trust Co. v. . HelmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Crocker v. . WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Tilton v. BeecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Duncomb v. . N.Y., H. N.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. McBroom v. Scottish Mortgage & Land Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Carmine v. MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Manchester & Lawrence Railroad v. Concord RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API