Legal Opinion
State v. Harris, 06 Je 36 (6-21-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 21, 2007No. 06 JE 36PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Marcus Harris appeals the post-Foster consecutive sentences entered by the Jefferson County Common Pleas Court after a prior remand from this court. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court was permitted to enter non-minimum, consecutive sentences or whether application of the Foster severance remedy created an ex post facto problem by way of the due process clause. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
{¶ 2} On September 11, 2003, two masked men entered the home of Scott and Angela Mellinger. One…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Rogers v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Hawkins, 07 Je 14 (3-18-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Schandel, 07-Ca-848 (12-4-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Long, 07 Be 27 (3-18-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Edwards, 07 Ma 235 (3-11-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. Kapsouris, 07 Ma 101 (3-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008