Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Tennessee

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 14, 2001No. 99-6218PublishedCited by 540 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

This case concerns the constitutionality of the retroactive application of a judicial decision abolishing the common law “year and a day rule.” At common law, the year and a day rule provided that no defendant could be convicted of murder unless his victim had died by the defendant’s act within a year and a day of the act. See, e. g., Louisville, E. & St. L. R. Co. v. Clarke, 152 U.S. 230, 239 (1894); 4 W. Blaekstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 197-198 (1769). The Supreme Court of Tennessee abolished the rule as it had existed at common law in Tennessee and applied its decision to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by540 opinions

  1. New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. BruenSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  2. State v. ReidTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. United States v. Fred Snow, Marcus Snow, Rahad RossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Metrish v. LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

535 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API