Legal Opinion

State v. Kapsouris, 07 Ma 101 (3-17-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 2008No. 07 MA 101Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Michael Kapsouris appeals the decision of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court sentencing him to consecutive sentences of ten years for aggravated robbery and three years for felonious assault. Two issues are raised in this case. The first is whether State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, violates the prohibition against ex post facto laws. The second issue is whether after Foster, is a trial court authorized to sentence an offender to consecutive sentences. For the reason expressed below, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. Balwanz, 07 Be 20 (9-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. Harris, 06 Je 36 (6-21-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API