Legal Opinion

State v. Holsclaw

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 19, 2017No. 13CR08512; A156968PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

Defendant, a designated predatory sex offender, used the public shower facilities in a YMCA building on multiple occasions. For that conduct, he was charged with seven counts of unlawfully being in a location where children regularly congregate, ORS 163.476 (2013), amended by Or Laws 2015, ch 820, § 17.1 Defendant was convicted after a bench trial. On appeal, he argues that the court should have entered a judgment of acquittal on each count because the evidence was insufficient to show that the location used by defendant—the YMCA shower facility— qualified as a “premises where persons under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. Gonzalez-ValenzuelaOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. McNallyOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Goodwin v. Kingsmen Plastering, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. In Re the Marriage of ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. ConnollyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. State v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API