Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Kingsmen Plastering, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2016No. CC 1110128; CA A151821; SC S062925PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

ORS 12.135(1)(a) provides that an action arising from the “construction, alteration or repair of any improvement to real property” must be commenced within “[t]he applicable period of limitation otherwise established by law.” The question in this construction defect case is precisely what is the period of limitation “otherwise established by law.” Plaintiffs argue that their action is subject to a six-year statute of limitations set out in ORS 12.080(3), which applies to actions “for interference with or injury to any interest of another in real property.” Defendant argues that the action is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Securities-Intermountain, Inc. v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Halperin v. PittsOregon Supreme Court · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Daniel N. Gordon, PC v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Vasquez v. Double Press Mfg., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State ex rel Torres-Lopez v. FahrionOregon Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Kinzua Resources v. DEQOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Hammond v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API