State v. Mays
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtShorr, J.
*231Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, following a bench trial, for first-degree theft, ORS 164.055, and second-degree theft, ORS 164.045.1 To convict a person of either first- or second-degree theft, the state must prove that the "market value" of the stolen item or items at the time and place of the crime exceeds certain monetary thresholds. ORS 164.115(1). Alternatively, the state may prove the replacement value of the item or items if that market value "cannot reasonably be ascertained." Id. Defendant argues that the trial court-acting as the trier of fact-erred when it relied…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. McNallyOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. G. L. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. PulverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021