Legal Opinion
State v. McNally
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 2017No. CC 111152528; CA A150977; SC S063644PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*316BALMER, C. J.
After defendant refused to comply with a police officer’s order to leave a bus station, the officer arrested him and charged him with, among other things, the misdemeanor offense of interfering with a peace officer. ORS 162.247(l)(b). At defendant’s subsequent trial, defendant asked the trial court to instruct the jury that it should acquit him of the charge of interfering with a peace officer if it found that he had engaged in passive resistance. See ORS 162.247(3)(b) (providing that person who is engaging in “passive resistance” does not commit crime of interfering with a peace…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Comcast Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. OwenOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. PayneOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. RamozOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- SAIF v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. KreisOregon Supreme Court · 2019
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.