Legal Opinion

State v. Osen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1937No. File No. 6474PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBujrr, J.

The plaintiff, for and on behalf of the workmen’s compensation bureau, brought action in the district court of Burleigh county to recover from the defendant, a resident of Richland county and engaged in business therein, premiums and accrued penalties alleged to be due from defendant as an employer. Within due time defendant made demand for change of the place of trial to the county of his residence. Demand was refused. The district court of Burleigh county denied a motion for change of venue, and from this order the defendant has appealed.

Under the provisions of chapter 315 of the Session…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Owen v. City of EastlandTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Village of North Fargo v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Kuhl v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Hannaman v. GordonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  5. Duffy v. DuffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coulter v. RambergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Murray v. MutschelknausNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Marks v. City of MandanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Severson v. EngbarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Springer v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API