Legal Opinion

Duffy v. Duffy

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1894No. 15495PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tlie Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion. These lands are situated in Alameda county. The superior court of the city and county of San Francisco had no jurisdiction to try the case. Nor could consent give such jurisdiction.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of tlie Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion. These lands are situated in Alameda county. The superior court of the city and county of San Francisco had no jurisdiction to try the case. Nor could consent give such jurisdiction. (Sloss v. DeToro, 77 Cal. 129; Franklin v. Dutton, 79 Cal. 605; Fritts v. Camp, 94 Cal. 393; Pennie v. Visher, 94 Cal. 323; Baker v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 73 Cal. 182; Watkins v. Degener, 63 Cal. 500; Grangers’ Bank v. Superior Court, 101 Cal. 198.)…

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

This action was brought by Bridget Duffy, as executrix of James A. Duffy, against Michael Duffy, for the purpose of compelling the defendant to convey to her, as such executrix, certain real estate situate in the city of Oakland, Alameda county, which, it is alleged, was bought by the said James in September, 1888, with his own money, but which was conveyed to the defendant, wffio it is alleged took such conveyance in trust for James, and that he still holds the same in trust.

The answer alleged that the whole of the purchase money paid therefor was the moneys of the defendant, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boyd v. M'LeanNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  2. Millard v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Warner v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Fritts v. CampCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. McPhail v. BuellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Schlyen v. SchlyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Maguire v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People v. SehornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API