Legal Opinion

Owen v. City of Eastland

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1935No. 6294PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Judge HARVEY

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

On February 27, 1924, the City of Eastland brought a suit, in the district court there, against Briggs Owen, on a paving certificate several months before it would have become barred by limitation. In the- case, the city was represented by both resident and non-resident attorneys. On January 26, 1926, the case was dismissed for want of prosecution. On June 6, 1927, *421one of the resident attorneys for the city in said suit, filed a motion to set aside the dismissal judgment, on the ground that same resulted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ricker, Lee & Co. v. ShoemakerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Howard Hume, Administrators, Etc. v. WindomTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Gautier v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1846
  4. Watson v. First Nat. Bank of ColemanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Harrison Machine Works v. ReigorTexas Supreme Court · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Rigo Manufacturing Company v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Adams v. SlatteryTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Reed v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Ac Interests, L.P., Formerly American Coatings, L.P. v. Texas Commission on Environmental QualityTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Snell v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API