Legal Opinion

Hannaman v. Gordon

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1924No. 425-3737PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

The statement of the case made by the Court of Civil Appeals, and adopted by us, follows:

“Appellee Bessie S. Hannaman recovered judgment in the court below against Sam Morris, one of the defendants, for the .sum of $13,591.10, with foreclosure of deed of trust lien against the said defendant, and also Sam Curtis and John J. Gordon, On certain property situated in the city of Amarillo. From this judgment defendant John J. Gordon appeals.
“The only question for decision is as to the right of the plaintiff in the court below to enforce her deed of trust lien against the property in question as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ricker, Lee & Co. v. ShoemakerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Jones v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Goldenberg v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Tribby v. WokeeTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Wood & Kinkaid v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Owen v. City of EastlandTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Curtis v. SpeckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. First State Bank & Trust Co. v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Austin v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Taylor v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API