Legal Opinion
Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation District
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1961No. 8966PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNUDSON, Justice.
Four separate cases are involved in this appeal. Pence v. Big Lost River Irriga tion District, 83 Idaho 393, 364 P.2d 158; Donahue v. Big Lost River Irrigation District, 83 Idaho 393, 364 P.2d 158; Johnson v. Big Lost River Irrigation District, 83 Idaho 394, 364 P.2d 159. They have been consolidated for trial and upon this appeal.
The respondents in each case (plaintiffs) seek to recover for damages allegedly caused by appellant, Big Lost River Irrigation District, in the designing, construction, maintenance and operation of an artificial channel in the Big Lost River across…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Baldwin v. EwingIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Newell v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Stearns Ex Rel. Stearns v. GravesIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Say v. HodginIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Weber v. BiddleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Whitt v. JarnaginIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Davis v. Nelson-Deppe, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. CutlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.