Legal Opinion

Whitt v. Jarnagin

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1966No. 9774PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

This is a tort action whereby appellant seeks damages on account of his personal injuries and damages to his automobile, sustained as the result of a collision with a cow on U.S. Highway 95. Appellant, in his complaint, alleges respondents’ concurrent and consecutive acts of negligence as causative of the collision, injuries and damage, and asserts joint and several liability of respondents.

On December 8, 1962, about 10:30 o’clock p. m., appellant was driving his automobile at a speed of 50 to 55 miles per hour in a northwesterly direction on U.S. Highway 95 approximately 1 and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mary Ann Waynick v. Chicago's Last Department Store, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  2. Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Toone v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Skaggs Drug Centers, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Pendlebury v. Western Casualty and Surety Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StearnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Alegria v. PayonkIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Sharp v. W.H. Moore, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Straley v. Idaho Nuclear CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Odenwalt v. ZaringIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API