Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Calhoun

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 9, 2006No. Misc. Docket AG No. 57, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCathell, J.

Pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751 1 of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC), 2 the Attorney Grievance Commission (the “Commission” or “Bar Counsel”), acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition for disciplinary action or remedial action against Candace K. Calhoun, Esquire (“Respondent”), charging her with violations arising out of her representation of Mr. Paul E. Schell. With respect to the MRPC, the petition alleged that respondent violated Rules 1.1 (Competence), 3 1.3 (Diligence), 4 1.4 (Communication), 5 1.5 (Fees), 6 1.15 (Safekeeping Property), 7 8.1 (Bar…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SweitzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NwadikeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API