Legal Opinion

Boehm v. Boehm

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2002No. 20010318PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1]- David Boehm appeals from a divorce judgment, challenging the trial court’s denial of his motion for continuance, the property division, and child support calculation. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a continuance, and was not clearly erroneous in its property division. The. trial court did err as a matter of law in calculating David’s child support obligation. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand .for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

[¶ 2] Sheila and David Boehm were married in August of 1989. Sheila…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Nastrom v. NastromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Freed v. FreedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. StephensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Riemers v. Peters-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Carkuff v. BalmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Boehm v. BoehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Riemers v. Peters-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API