Legal Opinion
Riemers v. Peters-Riemers
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 2004No. 20030353Published
1Opinion of the Court
684 N.W.2d 619 (2004)
Roland C. RIEMERS, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
Jenese PETERS-RIEMERS, Michael L. Gjesdahl, and Gjesdahl & Dietz, PLLP, Defendants and Appellees.
No. 20030353.
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
July 23, 2004.
Roland C. Riemers, pro se, Grand Forks, N.D., plaintiff and appellant.
Michael L. Gjesdahl, Gjesdahl & Associates, Fargo, N.D., for defendants and appellees.
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Roland Riemers appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his civil action[1] against Jenese Peters-Riemers (n/k/a Peters-Harris), his former wife, her attorney, Michael Gjesdahl, and his law firm. We…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hofsommer v. Hofsommer Excavating, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Hurt v. FreelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Muchow v. LindbladNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. ZiebarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Zuger v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.