Legal Opinion

Hoverson v. Hoverson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2001No. 20000227PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Carl Hoverson appeals from the trial court’s judgment, arguing the trial court clearly erred in valuing and distributing the parties’ property, in awarding Deborah spousal support, and in calculating Carl’s child support obligation. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I

[¶ 2] Deborah and Carl Hoverson married in 1977. They, have five children, ages 23, 21, 19, 17, and 11. During the early years of their marriage, Carl farmed and Deborah was a homemaker and bookkeeper for the farm.

[¶ 3] In 1994, Carl established a potato farming partnership, Hoverson Farms,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Fischer v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ruff v. RuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Linrud v. LinrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Heggen v. HeggenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Kostelecky v. KosteleckyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Sommers v. SommersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Hitz v. HitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Stoppler v. StopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Amsbaugh v. AmsbaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API