Legal Opinion

Boehm v. Boehm

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2002No. 20010318Published

1Opinion of the Court

651 N.W.2d 672 (2002)

2002 ND 144

Sheila BOEHM, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

David BOEHM, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 20010318.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

August 29, 2002.

Todd D. Kranda, Kelsch, Kelsch, Ruff & Kranda, Mandan, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Robert V. Bolinske, Jr., Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant.

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] David Boehm appeals from a divorce judgment, challenging the trial court's denial of his motion for continuance, the property division, and child support calculation. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a continuance, and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Nastrom v. NastromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Freed v. FreedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API