Legal Opinion

Rothenberger Et Ux. v. Reading City

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 12, 1929No. Appeal, 68PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The City of Reading found it necessary to construct an impounding dam so that its water supply might be enlarged. Surveyors were employed to determine the lands affected by the proposed enterprise, which extended along a stream known as Maiden Creek for a distance of more than ten miles. For several years these investigators continued their examinations, and the proposed taking of all that was necessary became known to the owners of land in the community. In all seventy-five farms and more than four hundred smaller tracts were damaged, and these were, from time to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Penn. Schuyl. V. R. v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. First National Bank v. PaffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Appeal of FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. O'Donnell v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. City of Pittsburg v. Epping-Carpenter Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Thornton v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. State Highway Commission v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. United States v. 3.544 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Philadelphia County, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  4. Earl M. Kerstetter, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Chatfield v. Board of Revision of TaxesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API