Legal Opinion

Earl M. Kerstetter, Inc. v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1961No. Appeal, No. 202PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bok,

This is the Commonwealth’s appeal from what it considers an excessive judgment for compensation in an eminent domain case.

The facts are that appellee signed an agreement of sale for 9% acres of land in the Borough of Pottstown on February 3, 1956, and at settlement held on April 24, 1956, received a deed for it. On August 30, 1956, the Commonwealth condemned 3.2 acres, isolating and rendering useless .84 acre and leaving appellee 5.7 acres. The reason for condemnation was the extension *170of Route !100. On August 81, 1956, appellee’s revised plot plan, showing a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Penn. Schuyl. V. R. v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Sgarlat Estate v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Chatfield v. Board of Revision of TaxesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Gilleland v. New York State Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Chambers v. South Chester Bor.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Snyder v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Iske v. Metropolitan Utilities District of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Nash v. HuntSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  5. Chiorazzi v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API