Legal Opinion

Thornton v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 27, 1948No. 6 Div. 620PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

The appeal arises from a judgment awarding damages to a landowner, appellant Thornton, in an eminent domain proceeding instituted by the City of Birmingham to condemn the property for a city park. The assignments of error all relate to questions pertaining to compensation due for the taking. The case was painstakingly tried. The parties were ably represented by skillful counsel who exhibited much diligence in presenting the respective contentions, as well as knowledge of the pertinent, principles, and our view is that the trial proceeded without prejudicial error to the.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Yarbrough v. MallorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. City of St. Louis v. Paramount Shoe Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. EricksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. United States v. 5139.5 Acres of Land, in Aiken and Barnwell Counties, S. C., Tract No. D-308Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  3. Housing Authority v. Decatur Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Southern Electric Generating Co. v. LeibacherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. HeldermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API