Legal Opinion

Crume v. Rivers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 29, 1936No. 26402PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Okmulgee county, which reversed in part a judgment of the county court of Okmulgee county and surcharged the account of the plaintiff in error in a guardianship matter.

The salient facts, as shown by the record before us, are substantially as follows: The plaintiff in error was the guardian of one Sealey Alexander, a minor, for several years prior to and until said ward attained his majority in September, 1017, and thereafter plaintiff in error, acting under a power of attorney, transacted the business of said Sealey Alexander until…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. McFetridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Estate of LawPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1891
  3. Burton v. ComptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Henry Miller, in Error v. David Austen, William S. Wilmerding, and David Austen, Jr.Supreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. City of Aberdeen v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hendricks v. Grant County BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. Culbertson v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Fletcher v. City of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Baker v. FinnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Matter of Conservatorship of SpindleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API