Legal Opinion

Henry Miller, in Error v. David Austen, William S. Wilmerding, and David Austen, Jr.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 21, 1852PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

54 U.S. 218

13 How. 218

14 L.Ed. 119

HENRY MILLER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,

v.

DAVID AUSTEN, WILLIAM S. WILMERDING, AND DAVID

AUSTEN, JR., DEFENDANTS.

December Term, 1851

1

THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Ohio.

2

On the 8th of February, 1840, the Mississippi Union Bank issued the following certificate:

3

MISSISSIPPI UNION BANK, }

4

Jackson, Miss. Feb. 8th, 1840. }

5

I hereby certify, that Hugh Short has deposited in this bank, payable 12 months from 1st May, 1839, with 5 per cent. interest till due, fifteen hundred dollars, for the use of…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Catron.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Shelby v. GuySupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  3. Green v. Lessee of NealSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  4. Kimball & Kiniston v. HuntingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1833
  5. Wilcox v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1839

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. American Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Bull v. Bank of KassonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Curran v. WitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Klauber v. BiggerstaffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Fells Point Savings Institution v. WeedonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API