Legal Opinion
City of Aberdeen v. National Surety Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1929No. 21503. Department TwoPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
The facts in this case, to all intents and purposes, are not in dispute, and show, that in 1922 the finance committee of the city council of the city of Aberdeen decided to invest ten thousand dollars of the city’s funds, and, pursuant to this decision, the city treasurer was authorized to go to the bank and see if the bank would accept time deposits. In December, 1922, the original time deposit in the sum of ten thou sand dollars was placed in the Hayes and Hayes'bank, and it had been renewed every six months down until the bank failed.
The court found:
“That on or about the 7th day of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. McFetridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- State ex rel. Port of Seattle v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Kavanagh v. Bank of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Bardsley v. SternbergWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- State ex rel. Port of Seattle v. GainesWashington Supreme Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Graham v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Lincoln v. RickettsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Crume v. RiversSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Valley National Bank v. First National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Moon Motor Car Co. v. State Ex Rel. ShullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.