Legal Opinion
Puritan Baking Co. v. Volton
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 26, 1922No. 6 Div. 724PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
This cause was tried before the circuit judge without a jury under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. We hero set out the finding and judgment as follows:
“Comes the plaintiff and defendants in person and by their attorneys, and it being found by the court that plaintiff was in defendant’s employ, and while acting in the line and scope of his employment his right hand was caught in one of defendant’s machines which the said employé was engaged to operate, that as a result of said accident the said hand was severely mangled, lacerated, cut, and bruised, necessitating the amputation of the index…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- In Re the Claims of PetrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Pater v. Superior Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Payne v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Life Casualty Ins. Co. v. PeacockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- SCI ALABAMA FUNERAL SERVICES v. HesterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Ex Parte Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Nolan v. Ernest Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Swift Lumber, Inc. v. RamerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.