Legal Opinion

Pater v. Superior Steel Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1919No. Appeal, No. 76PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal, No. 76, Oct. T., 1918, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1917, No. 2114, sustaining an award of compensation in case of Elmer Pater v. Superior Steel Company, a corporation. Appeal from order of Workmen’s Compensation Board affirming award of referee. Before Haymaker, J. Error assigned was the affirmance of the award of the compensation board.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Brown,

The right arm of Elmer Pater, an employee of the Superior Steel Company, was caught in one of its rolls and badly crushed. Amputation followed, about an inch or three-fourths of an inch below the elbow. The referee found that “on account of the amputation of the forearm so near the elbow' joint and from the restricted motion of the elbow due to infection and interference with the muscles that move the joint the claimant has lost the permanent use of the right arm for all practical purposes.” Under this finding he was awarded compensation for two hundred and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShaleenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Jones v. BealeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Quinn v. Fidelity Beneficial Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Poor District v. Poor DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lente v. LuciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Tarr v. Hecla Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Cymbor v. Binder Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. McAlester Colliery Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API