Legal Opinion
Nolan v. Ernest Const. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 19, 1942No. 1 Div. 181PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
There are two matters discussed by petitioner seeking to review the opinion of the Court of Appeals.
One of them needs no particular emphasis by us except to say that we entertain no doubt as to the meaning of that Court or the correctness of its statement of the rule that when a permanent partial disability of a member is concurrent with a temporary total disability of it, the number of compensable weeks allowed for the latter must be deducted from the number of compensable weeks allowed for the former. Since the Diniaco case, Ex parte A. Diniaco & Bros., 207 Ala. 685, 93 So.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Galloway Coal Co. v. StanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- &198tna Life Ins. Co. v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Ex Parte A. Diniaco & Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State ex rel. Walker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Denmark v. Industrial Manufacturing Specialists, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- March v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
- Morris v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.