Legal Opinion
F. D. Hill & Co. v. Wallerich
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1965No. 37523PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, J. †
— This is an action to recover the loss of a real-estate commission.
Charles and Marian McPhail, owners of real estate with a dwelling house and other improvements entered into a written listing agreement with E. F. Bridewell, a real-estate salesman employed by F. D. Hill and Company, which provided for the exclusive right of the broker to obtain a buyer for the period April 6, 1959, to June 15, 1959. This listing agreement also provided that the selling price would be $70,000, $65,000 of which would be net to the owners and $5,000 as commission to the broker, who would also pay…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Louis Kamm, Inc. v. FlinkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Hein v. Chrysler Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Williams v. AshcraftNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Myers v. Arcadio, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Antwerp Diamond Exchange of America, Inc. v. Better Business Bureau of Maricopa County, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Scymanski v. DufaultWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Cherberg v. Peoples National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Island Air, Inc. v. LaBarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Holman v. CoieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.