Legal Opinion

Hein v. Chrysler Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1954No. 32945PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

Plaintiff, a former retail dealer in automobiles manufactured by defendant Chrysler Corporation, brought this action to recover in tort for the allegedly malicious interference by defendants with plaintiff’s business.

Prior to the trial of this action, plaintiff had obtained a judgment in the Federal court at Seattle in the amount of $31,675.43 against defendant Chrysler Corporation in an action denominated by plaintiff as a “breach of contract” suit. In that suit, Chrysler Corporation was the sole defendant.

In the present action, there were named as defendants Chrysler Corporation, DeSoto…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Doremus v. HennessyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Sorenson v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. E. L. Husting Co. v. Coca Cola Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Gazija v. Nicholas Jerns Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Worrie v. BozeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  5. Reninger v. State Dept. of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 1998

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API