Legal Opinion

Scymanski v. Dufault

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1971No. 42074PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

This case involves the tort of interference with business relations and the remedies which are available for that tort. For a proper understanding of the issues, the facts are presented at length.

In 1965, the United States Department of Agriculture issued a United States Hop Marketing Order which restricts the salable quantity of hops. Under this order, hops cannot be lawfully marketed unless covered by hop allotment base certificate rights (hereinafter called base), which vary according to a grower’s production history. These base rights are transferable.

Some of these base rights were held…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Corinthian Corp. v. White & Bollard, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Pollard v. McKenneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Dexter Horton Building Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Dube v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Pleas v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Pacific Northwest Shooting Park Ass'n v. City of SequimWashington Supreme Court · 2006

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API