Legal Opinion
Napoleon v. Xerox Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 26, 1987No. Civ. A. N-85-526 (RCZ)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
ZAMPANO, Senior District Judge.
In this action, filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and state tort law, the plaintiff alleges that the defendant, Xerox Corporation, discriminated against him by, inter alia, failing to provide adequate training for him, refusing to promote him, and wrongfully discharging him. As a consequence, he seeks reinstatement, compensatory and punitive damages, and attorney’s fees.
The moving papers indicate the plaintiff, a black male, was employed by Xerox…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ellis v. University of Kansas Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Makovi v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- DeLoreto v. MentDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- Makovi v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Ellis v. University Of Kansas Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.