Legal Opinion
DeLoreto v. Ment
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 2, 1996No. 3:96 CV 00859(GLG)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Defendants have moved this Court to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6), Fed.R.Civ.P., on the following grounds:(1) Eleventh Amendment immunity;(2) Abstention;(3) Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted;(4) Qualified immunity; and(5) Mootness.
For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion (Doc. # 6) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
The Facts
Plaintiffs are eleven former employees of the State of Connecticut Judicial Department employed most recently as Deputy Clerks in Geographical Area Courts in the State…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kuck v. DanaherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Henneberger v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Lopez v. Bay Shore Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- McBride v. RouthDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Querry v. MessarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.