Legal Opinion

Cain v. Horne

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2009No. CV-08-0189-PRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, Justice.

¶ 1 Article 2, Section 12, of the Arizona Constitution provides that “[n]o public money ... shall be appropriated to any religious worship, exercise, or instruction, or to the support of any religious establishment.” Article 9, Section 10, of the Arizona Constitution states that “[n]o tax shall be laid or appropriation of public money made in aid of any church, or private or sectarian school, or any public service corporation.” The issue before us is whether two state-funded programs violate these provisions of our constitution.

I

A

¶ 2 In 2006, the Legislature enacted two…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Zelman v. Simmons-HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the BlindSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kotterman v. KillianArizona Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry v. KileyArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Taxpayers for Public Education v. Douglas County School DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Niehaus v. HuppenthalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Arizona City Sanitary District v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. Arizona City Sanitary Dist. v. Pinal CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API