Legal Opinion

Niehaus v. Huppenthal

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 1, 2013No. 1 CA-CV 12-0242PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellants Sharon Niehaus and other interested organizations (collectively, Nie-haus) appeal the trial court’s judgment denying their request for injunctive relief and granting judgment to appellee John Huppen-thal (Huppenthal), in his capacity as Aizona State Superintendent of Public Instruction. Niehaus challenges the constitutionality of the A’izona Empowerment Scholarship Accounts program (ESA). For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 In 2011, the Aizona Legislature passed Senate Bill 1553, establishing the ESA, codified at A'izona…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Kotterman v. KillianArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Shofstall v. HollinsArizona Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fisher v. EdgertonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Franklin v. ClemettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. Biggs v. BetlachCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  4. Brush & Nib v. PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Candace Eidson v. SC Dept. of EducationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API