Legal Opinion

Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 24, 1986No. 84-1070PublishedCited by 276 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

The Washington Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment precludes the State of Washington from extending assistance under a state vocational rehabilitation assistance program to a blind person studying at a Christian college and seeking to become a pastor, missionary, or youth director. Finding no such federal constitutional barrier on the record presented to us, we reverse and remand.

*483f — {

Petitioner Larry Witters applied in 1979 to the Washington Commission for the Blind for vocational rehabilitation services pursuant to Wash. Rev. Code §74.16.181 (1981).1 That statute authorized the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Lynch v. DonnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Wallace v. JaffreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. NyquistSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by276 opinions

  1. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Williams v. LaraTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. PinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API