Rupp v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
Two basic questions are raised: (1) Did the trial court err in not admitting hospital records and records of Dr. Krueger, an attending orthopedist, in evidence, and (2) did the trial court err in failing to grant a new trial in the interest of justice or on the ground the damages awarded were inadequate, inconsistent, or motivated by perversity?
On the trial, the hospital records of Johnson’s Emergency, St. Luke’s, and St. Joseph’s Hospitals were offered in evidence by the plaintiff as entries in the usual course of business under sec. 327.25, Stats. The parties had stipu lated these records…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Sundquist v. Madison Railways Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Kelley v. CrawfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Ozaukee Finance Co. v. Cedarburg Lime Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Beilke v. KnaackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hagenkord v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Mitchell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Roberts v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Waters Ex Rel. Skow v. PertzbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Mosing v. HagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.