Legal Opinion

Mosing v. Hagen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1967PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

Basically there are three issues presented by this appeal:(1) Does sec. 262.13 (3), Stats., require the court to declare the service of the summons void?(2) Did the deposit of the summons together with the transcription of a discovery deposition in a sealed envelope with the clerk of court constitute filing?(3) Was sec. 262.13 (3), Stats., properly noticed for hearing and is it a valid rule of court?

Sec. 262.13, Stats., in part, provides:

“Summons, filing. (1) The summons shall be filed with the clerk of the court in which the action is brought and the clerk’s fee and state suit tax, if…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re Constitutionality of Statute Empowering Supreme Court to Promulgate Rules Regulating Pleading, Practice, & Procedure in Judicial ProceedingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State ex rel. Davis & Starr Lumber Co. v. PorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Pawlowski v. EskofskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Steffen v. LittleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Rupp v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gutter v. SeamandelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Davison v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. City of Madison v. Town of MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  5. Trinity Petroleum, Inc. v. Scott Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API