Sundquist v. Madison Railways Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Stevens, J.(1) The jury found all the facts essential to'a recovery by the plaintiff. , There is no question as to the paralyzed condition' of the plaintiff. -The case turns wholly upon the question whether the facts sustain the find-_ing of the- jury that the paralysis of the plaintiff followed naturally and directly from the shock .which she sustained when the automobile in which she was riding was struck by the defendant’s car. Upon this question there is a conflict in the testimony of the doctors. The plaintiff offered the testimony of the doctor who examined her the day after the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Block v. Milwaukee Street Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Faber v. C. Reiss Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Koehler v. Waukesha Milk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Hallum v. Village of OmroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Pankopf v. HinkleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Vincent E. Jenkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- In Re MeltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Waube v. WarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Colla v. MandellaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.