Legal Opinion

Ozaukee Finance Co. v. Cedarburg Lime Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1954PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

Defendant contends that for lack of service of process the judgment is void. Among other things plaintiff contends that by his motion defendant Cowhey has brought himself into court for a purpose other than to object to the court’s jurisdiction to enter judgment and that consequently he has made a general appearance in the action and has waived all defects in the service of process. If that contention is to be sustained there is no need to consider the question whether the judgment is void.

Defendant’s notice of motion, which recites that his attorney appears specially for the purpose of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clawson v. Boston Acme Mines Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Coad v. CoadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Schwantz v. MorrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Gale v. Consolidated Bus & Equipment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Mosing v. HagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Heaton v. Independent Mortuary Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Rupp v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Pavalon v. Thomas Holmes Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API