Beilke v. Knaack
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The facts are not in serious dispute. The plaintiff, a boy about nine year* of age at the time of the accident, was riding in a Chevrolet coach'which was being driven in an easterly direction along highway No. 30 by defendant Beilke. Highway No. 30, at the time of the accident, was a gravel road surfaced with asphalt with a driving surface about eighteen feet wide with three-foot gravel *492shoulders. Defendant Elroy Beilke, at the time of the accident, was a little past twenty-one years of age. Both the plaintiff and his brother were en route to the farm of another brother where they planned to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wick v. WickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by8 opinions
- Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Rozell v. RozellNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Munsert v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Rupp v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Fidelity Savings Bank v. AulikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.