Legal Opinion

Beilke v. Knaack

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

The facts are not in serious dispute. The plaintiff, a boy about nine year* of age at the time of the accident, was riding in a Chevrolet coach'which was being driven in an easterly direction along highway No. 30 by defendant Beilke. Highway No. 30, at the time of the accident, was a gravel road surfaced with asphalt with a driving surface about eighteen feet wide with three-foot gravel *492shoulders. Defendant Elroy Beilke, at the time of the accident, was a little past twenty-one years of age. Both the plaintiff and his brother were en route to the farm of another brother where they planned to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wick v. WickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Rozell v. RozellNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Munsert v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Rupp v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Fidelity Savings Bank v. AulikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API