Legal Opinion

Proctor v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 22, 1913No. A-1665PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Oklahoma County Court; John W. Hay son, Judge. Cecil Proctor was convicted of gaming, and appeals. Re- versed.

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, Cecil Proctor, was convicted at the March, 1912, term of the county court of Oklahoma county, on a charge of conducting a roulette game, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $500 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 60 days.

The Attorney General has filed the following confession of error in this case:

“The Attorney General would respectfully call this honorable court’s attention to the charging part of the information filed in this case, which is in words and figures as follows, to irit: ‘That the above-named Cecil Proctor did, in Oklahoma county, and in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prestage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Gardner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Cobble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API