Legal Opinion
Padgett v. Padgett
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 25, 1984No. 83-955PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
This is the parties’ second appeal arising from the filing of a writ of attachment by Mrs. Padgett seeking to enforce a consent order, entered in 1964 pursuant to the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), D.C.Code §§ 30-301 et seq. (1981), directing Mr. Padgett to pay alimony and child support. As a result of an appeal by Mrs. Padgett from the granting of a motion to quash the writ, the writ proceeding was remanded to the trial court for de novo consideration of Mr. Padgett’s defense of laches in light of his present financial condition. Padgett v. Padgett, 472 A.2d 849…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smith v. PollinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Ritz v. RitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
- Darling v. DarlingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Padgett v. PadgettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- McGehee v. MaxfieldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stebbins v. StebbinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Carter v. Cathedral Avenue Cooperative, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Bagley v. Foundation for the Preservation of Historic GeorgetownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- McQueen v. Lustine Realty Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- State ex rel. A.N.C. v. GrenleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.