Legal Opinion
Bagley v. Foundation for the Preservation of Historic Georgetown
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 26, 1994No. 92-CV-1462, 93-CV-87PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
In this action by the Foundation for the Preservation of Historic Georgetown against Smith W. Bagley and Elizabeth A. Frawley (collectively Bagley) to enforce the terms of an easement agreement, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Foundation and awarded the Foundation substantial counsel fees. Bagley makes numerous contentions on appeal, and claims in particular that there were genuine issues of material fact precluding the entry of summary judgment and that the award of counsel fees was excessive. In No. 92-CV-1462, we dismiss as premature, sua…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Trilon Plaza Co. v. Allstate Leasing Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc. v. WilnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Washington Properties, Inc. v. Chin, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Dyer v. William S. Bergman & Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Link v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Parvizian, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.