Legal Opinion
McQueen v. Lustine Realty Co., Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 2, 1988No. 86-474, 86-475PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
In this consolidated appeal, several tenants in a building managed by the appellee challenge trial court orders increasing the dollar amounts of protective orders entered in actions for summary possession now pending against them in the Landlord and Tenant Branch. Recognizing a conflict in our caselaw, this court, sua sponte, ordered removal of the consolidated cases from the regular calendar and scheduled them for hearing en banc to resolve the preliminary jurisdictional question of the interlocutory appealability of protective orders generally. We appointed amici…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- United Methodist Church v. WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Colin Andrew v. American Import Center and District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Mullin v. N Street Follies Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Crockett v. Deutsche Bank National TrustDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.