Legal Opinion

Carter v. Cathedral Avenue Cooperative, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1987No. 85-1354, 85-1444, 85-1754, 85-1755PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

In these combined appeals, we are called upon to deal with the jurisdictional relationship between the filing of a motion in the trial court that terminates the running of the time within which an appeal may be taken and the filing of the notice of appeal itself.

I

Appellants’ predecessor in interest granted a 99-year lease to appellee’s predecessor in interest. The present dispute between the parties is over the timeliness of giving of notice under a rental adjustment clause in the lease. The issues appellants ask us to decide on appeal are whether that dispute is…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Smith v. PollinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  4. Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Southland Industries, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. D.D. v. M.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Childs v. PurllDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Stebbins v. StebbinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. In re S.C.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Bolton v. Bernabei & Katz, PLLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API